‘True Blood’ laid the foundation for fantasy genre shows that came after it, and was immensely popular through its seven seasons. But there’s a reason why fans refuse to revisit the ‘True Blood’ finale.
HBO transformed television viewing experience with the premiere of its camp horror, vampire genre show, back in 2008. The series is based on the best-selling dark romance series by Charlaine Harris, titled “The Southern Vampire Mysteries”. When fans look back and remember ‘True Blood’, they recall a surprisingly progressive show that had a depth to it. Beneath the erotica and supernatural themes, the show was trying to be diverse and inclusive.
- What’s so great about ‘True Blood’?
- The ‘True Blood’ finale is one of the worst finales ever
- This is why fans are furious about the ending
It also arrived at a time when vampires were reaching attainable heights in pop-culture, thanks to the ‘Twilight’ films. ‘True Blood’ was HBO’s first attempt at diving headfirst into genre-based television. In many ways, the fantasy horror series paved the way for bigger shows like ‘Westworld’ and ‘Game of Thrones’.
‘True Blood’ was a gripping show in the initial few seasons, but it went downhill soon after. It primarily followed the love story of a telepathic waitress Sookie Stackhouse (Anna Paquin) and vampire Bill Compton (Stephen Moyer). Other important characters included Eric Northman (Alexander Skarsgård), Sam Merlotte (Sam Trammell), and Jason Stackhouse (Ryan Kwanten).
The only terrible thing about the show, apart from its last few convoluted seasons, was the ‘True Blood’ finale. Not only did it deceive fans who believed in these characters, but also left them with more questions than answers. ‘True Blood’ might be remembered forever, but it won’t be for how it established genre TV. It’ll be remembered for its jaw-dropping, unexpected finale, and not in a good way.
Keep reading to revisit the show and find out why fans despise the ‘True Blood’ finale.
What’s so great about ‘True Blood’?
To summarise the show in a single sentence, ‘True Blood’ is to adults what ‘The Vampire Diaries’ is to teens. When the show first premiered twelve years ago, it did more than what other shows like itself tried to achieve. It said no to cliched love-triangles, yes to representation, even if it was through a fantasy allegory.
Its premise was simple. The development of a synthetic blood substitute called “Tru Blood” helped vampires “come out of the coffin” and reveal themselves to the world. The story begins right after an amendment is proposed to the U.S. constitution that safeguards the rights of vampires. Humans and vampires are expected to co-exist and both species are awarded the same rights, but the reason behind this is never revealed.
‘True Blood’ depicted violence and gore quite graphically, viewers were accustomed to seeing blood splatter all over their television screens. The show created parallels with issues like prejudice against minority groups and is often regarded to have represented the LGBTQ+ community. The vampires in Bon Temps are considered to be a minority group, with anti-vampire groups making it impossible for them to attain peace. While these are things that make the show great, they’re not enough for fans to forget the ‘True Blood’ finale.
The ‘True Blood’ finale is one of the worst finales ever
When viewers were first introduced to this undead tale, the mysterious characters and steady plot had them intrigued. Unlike ‘Twilight’ and ‘The Vampire Diaries’, which catered to the teenage audience, ‘True Blood’ was made for adults. It was compelling and had its fans hooked to it while establishing itself as one of HBO’s most popular shows.
Everything was going well for Sookie and Bill’s love story until the ‘True Blood’ finale. To say that it ruined the entirety of the series would be an understatement. It was bad enough that Bill refused to take the Hep-V virus cure, but he managed to make it worse by asking Sookie to kill him. Of course, Bill succeeded in his desperate attempt and left behind a mourning Sookie, in a pool of his blood. Pam and Eric sell the new “Tru Blood”, Jessica and Hoyt get married, and then comes a three-year time-jump!
In the final moments, the rest of the gang are reunited for thanksgiving dinner in Sookie’s yard. Everyone looks happy, especially Sookie, who is now pregnant and married to a mystery man. The episode lacked foundation, and the journey the characters had to go through feels like a waste of time.
This is why fans are furious about the ending
The ‘True Blood’ finale was a complicated mess, there is no doubt about it! Maybe the show took a turn for the worse when showrunner Alan Ball decided to stand down. The lack of leadership and a steady vision for the show resulted in an abrupt, incomplete ending.
It’s also unbelievable how Bill, a vampire who was kind, gentle, and protective, was selfish all along. Instead of taking the cure and fighting the Hep-V virus, his character decided to give up and die instead. And just when his death-wish wasn’t enough, he enlisted Sookie to kill him! The sudden portrayal of Bill as an antagonist was baseless and had no foundation to rest. It was beyond disappointing for fans to watch, especially for those who rooted for Bill.
There are so many things that could have been different about the ending. Bill could be more optimistic, and Sookie could have refused to kill him. But the show’s seven-year-long journey culminated in, what is to this day, an unforgivable finale.
So, do we blame fans for never wanting to revisit the ‘True Blood’ finale? The answer is a resounding no. Did you enjoy watching the ‘True Blood’ finale? Do share your views with us in the comments below.